DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
HCG
Docket N
24 Mar l
NR4499-14
wm oO
ear as
This is in reference to your application for
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1
orrection of your naval
Bic
io
5
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
24 March 2015. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
4
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval ord and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered =the advisory opinions furnished by HOMC memo 1070 JPL dated
21 January 2015 and HOMC memo 1070 JPL dated 2 October 2014, copies of
which are attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration
“he Board found that the evidence submitted
establish the existence of probable material
this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinions. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
within one year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence
is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its
decision in your case. In this regard, it is important to keep in
mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to ail oficial
records.
Docket No. NR4499-14
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosures: HQMC memo 1070 JPL dtd 21 Jan 15
HOMC memo 1070 JPL dtd 2 Oct 14
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5495 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. NRS495-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2570 14
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Koman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on & January 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (4) and (5), the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the following...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7373 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”") entry dated 21 June 2012 (copy at Tab A). 2, The Board, consisting cf =} iis MMMM, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 January 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3392 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {i) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page il (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"} entries dated 16 February and 7 October 2012 (copies at Tabs A and B, respectively) . The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Koman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2015, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5316 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a}, Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page llic) (“Administrative Remarks (1070) °} entry dated 21 March 2011 {copy at Tab A). a reviewed be onér's Bilegations of error and injustice on 25 January 202 a pursuant to its regulations, devermined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5935 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page ll ("Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 5 March 2013 and. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (2) and (3), the Board finds the existence of an error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8961 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 11 March 2009 and 11 August 2011. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosures (2) and (3), the Board finds the existence of an error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4745 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O! c. Enclosure (2), the report of the HOMC PERB in Petitioner's case, shows that the PERB directed removing the contested fitness report for 1 January to 27 April 2008, but commented to the effect that the five remaining reports at issue should stand. In enclosure (5), Petitioner provided new evidence in support of his new request to remove the page 11 entries dated 11 June 2010 and 12 May 2011. g. In enclosures (6) and (7),...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6393 14
damarv 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a} 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 20 September 2012 {copy at Tab #). The Board, fe sens sions of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6447 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing any and all references regarding imposition of a nonjudicial punishment (NUP) for willful disobedience. In this regard, these AOs recommend Petitioner's request be denied because he did receive NJP on 11 May 2007, and was properly issued an adverse FITREP as a result of the NUP. REED Recorder S....